Friday, October 25, 2019
Toward Effective Emotional Intelligence Simulation Essay -- Psychology
The ability to understand the emotions of others is critical for successful interactions among humans (Dias & Paiva, 2009; Kazemifard, Ghasem-Aghaee, & Ãâ€"ren, 2010). The psychological theory of emotional intelligence (EI) proposes four categories of relevant abilities (Mayer & Salovey, 1997): (1) identifying emotions, (2) understanding emotions, (3) using emotions in thought processes, and (4) managing emotions. This research focuses on emotion understanding, the cognitive activity of making inferences using emotional knowledge about why an agent is in an emotional state (e.g., unfair treatment makes an individual angry) and which actions are associated with the emotional state (e.g., an angry individual attacks others). Such emotion understanding in humans develops through their experiences with other agents. How might such learning in humans inform a model to enable artificial emotional agents to develop emotion understanding? Our approach to answering this question proposes a model of emotion understanding that combines psychological theories of episodic and semantic memory with ...
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
12 Angry Men Essay †Pathos ethos and logos Essay
Pathos,ethos and logos in 12 angry men Introduction            Twelve Angry men is a movie of twelve jurors who are struck in one room trying to comprehend with one another whether a young boy is responsible for his father’s death. Emotions come up when one of the jurors stands up for the lad defending him that he was not guilty. This film is full of Ethos, logos and pathos. This paper explains some of the places these rhetorical tools are employed. Pathos, ethos and logos instances            In the film twelve Angry men, Juror number eight employs ethos when he was trying to convince juror number ten that the boy’s father could not have heard the boy say to the old man, â€Å"I am going to kill you†. He says, â€Å"there’s something else I would like to talk about for a minute. I think we have already proved that the old man could not have heard the lad say, â€Å"I am gonna kill you†, but supposing†¦Ã¢â‚¬ he was trying to convince them that when you say something, it doesn’t mean that you are going to do exactly that.            We can see a clear demonstration of pathos in the film where juror number ten says, â€Å"he is just a common ignorant slob, he does not even speak good English.†Juror number elven replies to him, He does not speak English†¦Ã¢â‚¬ this is a clear irony in the arguments presented by juror number ten. Juror number ten also in another instances demonstrates pathos where he is trying to convine the jury that the slum dwellers are in general bad people when he exclaims, â€Å"They get drunk†¦ oh, they’re real big drinkers, all of ’em – you know that – and bang: someone’s lyin’ in the gutter. Oh, nobody’s blaming them for it. That’s the way they are! By nature! You know what I mean? VIOLENT!†through this, we can clearly seethe emotions that this juror had against the slum dwellers.            Logos is extensively employed in the film, but profoundly I noticed it when juror number eleven was convincing the other jurors that the old man could not have moved as swiftly as it was tring to be portrayed because of the formerly suffered stroke. He says, â€Å"â€Å"I’d like to find out if an old man who drags one foot when he walks, because he had a stroke last year, could get from his bedroom to his front door in fifteen seconds.†This was a logical argument of how the old man could not have dragged himself so fast to see the lad run out of his home. He also convinces the jury of how the woman across the street could not be able to see the boy through the train without her spectacles on. He explains, â€Å"It’s logical to assume that she wasn’t wearing them when she was in bed. Tossing and turning, trying to fall asleep.†Then the juror continues by saying, â€Å"I don’t know – I’m guessing! I’m also guessing that she probably didn’t put her glasses on when she turned to look casually out of the window. And she, herself, testified the killing took place just as she looked out. The lights went off a split second later – she couldn’t have had time to put them on then. Here’s another guess: maybe she honestly thought she saw the boy kill his father – I say she only saw a blur.†All this was by the juror number eight’s logical reasoning. It is also clear in the film when he say, â€Å"It is logical to assume†¦Ã¢â‚¬ He explains, â€Å"It’s logical to assume that she wasn’t wearing them when she was in bed. Tossing and turning, trying to fall asleep.†Then the juror continues by saying, â€Å"I don’t know – I’m guessing! I’m also guessing that she probably didn’t put her glasses on when she turned to look casually out of the window. And she, herself, testified the killing took place just as she looked out. The lights went off a split second later – she couldn’t have had time to put them on then. Here’s another guess: maybe she honestly thought she saw the boy kill his father – I say she only saw a blur.†All this was by the juror number eight’s logical reasoning. It is also clear in the film when he say, â€Å"It is logical to assume†¦Ã¢â‚¬ He also convinces the jury of how the woman across the street could not be able to see the boy through the train without her spectacles on. He explains, â€Å"It’s logical to assume that she wasn’t wearing them when she was in bed. Tossing and turning, trying to fall asleep.†Then the juror continues by saying, â€Å"I don’t know – I’m guessing! I’m also guessing that she probably didn’t put her glasses on when she turned to look casually out of the window. And she, herself, testified the killing took place just as she looked out. The lights went off a split second later – she couldn’t have had time to put them on then. Here’s another guess: maybe she honestly thought she saw the boy kill his father – I say she only saw a blur.†All this was by the juror number eight’s logical reasoning. It is also clear in the film when he say, â€Å"It is logical to assume†¦Ã¢â‚¬ References http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050083/quoteshttp://jiripik.me/2012/06/03/12-angry men teamwork team decision making effect of prejudices/ Source document
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Intergovernmental Exercise Example
Intergovernmental Exercise Example Intergovernmental Exercise – Essay Example Intergovernmental Finance Exercise Type A grant The origin of the tax is identified as personal income taxes, corporate income taxes, generalsales taxes and taxes on alcoholic beverages. The allocation of the specified share is identified as the population and the effort undertaken towards paying of the tax. 2. Type G grant This is because the decision is to assist provincial governments hence making it an ad hoc decision without a clear strategy. The cost put towards the â€Å"assistance†has no specified origin or clarity in the amount that is sent out. However, it is significant to tell between it from type H grant since this assistance is done annually. 3. Type H grant The situation falls under type H grant since the response to the situation at hand is ad hoc and the means of assistance are also unplanned. The duration through which this assistance will be carried out is undetermined too. It is also unknown what amount of assistance will be required. 4. Type F grant This is a type F grant because the decision to assist is based on the formula/determination of areas with highest poverty and infant mortality rates and substandard housing. It is differentiated from grant B because the method of assistance is not specified. 5. Type F grant The amount of assistance is not specified (only referred to as a portion of the tax revenue)and the assistance is partial based on the expenditure needs. The method used to determine the assistance is formula based since the distribution is determined by how extra ordinary the needs in expenditure are and on an equal per capita basis grant basis. The decision to give this assistance is also ad hoc. 6. Type B grant The origin of the tax is VAT and the tax distributed is specific. The tax is distributed on a formula based method that is 75% of it is given on the basis of an equal per capita perspective. The rest is given to states that have a below average tax capacity. The fact that it is accounted for tax and distributed by formula makes it a type B grant. 7. Type G grant The government provides reimbursement that is unspecified through an unplanned means. This makes this situation a type G grant. 8. Type H grant The provision of the income tax is annual though the share allocated is not specified (Ad hoc) and the method used to allocate these funds is also unclear (Ad hoc). This makes the situation a type H grant. 9. Type G grant The government repays the local government that is affected by the loss incurred in paying its fiscal need. This is an unplanned decision which pays for approved expenditures which are indispensable public requirements such as learning, public protection and transportation. That gives the basis of the formula used in the assistance hence making it a type G grant. 10. Type K grant The assistance is made as a reimbursement of an approved government project. This automatically qualifies it to be a type K grant. Bibliography Bahl, Roy and Johannes F. Linn. Intergovernmental Finance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)